The Idaho House killed legislation allowing FBI background checks on certain state employees. The bill’s sponsor warned that the state could lose millions of dollars the state Department of Labor relies on to pay federal unemployment benefits.

Rep. Heather Scott, R-Blanchard, decried the bill as “federal bullying,” and Rep. Lynn Luker, R-Boise, questioned whether it was too broadly worded. Rep. Dorothy Moon, R-Stanley, declared, “I have a real issue with data collection being obtained in the state.”

Georgia Smith, spokeswoman for the state Department of Labor, said late Monday, “We are trying to move as quickly as possible to review our options and come up with an alternative.”

The bill would have authorized the department to conduct FBI fingerprint-based background checks, which include a 50-state criminal record check, citizenship verification, and local law enforcement checks everywhere the employee has lived, work or attended school in the past five years, on employees, applicants, contractors, interns and others. Those checks are required by the IRS for any employee who has access to confidential taxpayer information that taxpayers provide to the IRS when they file their taxes.

Smith said the legislation doesn’t address data collection. “It’s about protecting everybody’s federal tax information,” she said, “and making sure that the people who have access to that data have cleared an FBI fingerprint-based background check.”

The department currently has 26 employees who have access to that data as part of the Treasury Offset Program, which goes after unemployment overpayments that occur through fraud or misrepresentation by putting a hold on the taxpayer’s income tax refund. Participation in that offset program is mandatory for all states; since 2013, Idaho has recovered $9.5 million in overpayments.

Rep. Eric Redman, R-Athol, the House sponsor of the bill, said, “This is an immediate need to conduct checks on employees with access to taxpayers’ information.”

He said the department must show by next November that it has statutory authority to conduct the FBI background checks in order to continue using the program. A federal grant will cover the department’s $10,910 equipment cost to conduct the new checks, he said.

Moon said, “Yes, it might be grant money, tax money, but we also pay federal taxes. There’s no line between where the tax money is coming from, so that’s why I’m voting no.”

Scott told the House, “There were a lot of problems I saw with this bill. It’s an example of federal bullying. It is a huge expansion of power by the Department of Labor which includes very broad language.”

Quality background checks; a pathway to better deals

Technology has played a significant role in various aspects of our lives, including corporate investigations. Technology has revolutionized the way corporate investigations are now being handled. Some of the benefits of technology on corporate investigations include; an extensive reach, improved efficiency, speed of delivery and new insights. But then again, despite the merits of technology, one common demerit observed in its role in corporate investigation is the false sense of security it gives to both clients and investigators.

Because a process is faster and cheaper doesn't mean it will lead to a more productive outcome. Technology may give us information at the speed of light, but deciding if that information is useful, is a task people still have to do. No matter how helpful technology is, it can never replicate the importance of human flexibility and analysis. But despite this flaw with technology, we still see more and more people depending on it more than their own human intuition and cognition. With each passing day, there is an increasing reliance on in the corporate investigations industry, notably in places like the US, where there is a considerable amount of public records. The same leeway is often not found in other countries due to their rigid ways of operation. It is one of the reasons why investors are always optimistic about transacting in the UD, as they are reeled in by the eye-catching technology that expedites work, and reduces costs.

Recently, there has been an increase in the number of firms that provide computer driven background checks. An increase in regulations and a more competitive environment has seen individuals looking for ways to effectively carry out background checks Miami most affordably and conveniently possible, and this need has seen various background check firms benefit continuously.

Most of these firms offer low-level background checks Miami that concentrates on a single jurisdiction, and often, they ignore other areas like media searches. Such menial check will often produce, poor results no matter which way you look at it. But a quality background check will provide an avenue to make better decisions and deals. For more information on quality background check companies in Miami, contact Clearcheks today.